Criterion VI
|
Criterion-VI |
||||||||||||||||
|
Metric No. |
Key Indicator: 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership |
|
||||||||||||||
|
6.1.1 |
The institutional governance and leadership are in accordance with the institution’ is visible in various institutional practices such as NEP implementation, sustained institutional growth, decentralization, participation in the institutional governance, and in their short-term and long-term institutional perspective plan.
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Metric No. |
Key Indicator: 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment |
|
||||||||||||||
|
6.2.1 |
The institutional perspective plan is effectively deployed and the functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment and service rules, procedures, etc.
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
6.2.2 |
Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation 1. Administration 2. Finance and Accounts 3. Student Admission and Support 4. Examination
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Metric No. |
Key Indicator: 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies |
|
||||||||||||||
|
6.3.1 |
The institution has a performance appraisal system, effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff and avenues for career development/progression
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
6.3.2 |
Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conference / workshop and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years.
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
6.3.3 |
Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in faculty development programmes (FDP), and Management Development Prorammes (MDPs) professional development / administrative training programs during the last five years.
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Metric No. |
Key Indicator: 6.4: Financial Management and Resource Mobilization |
|
||||||||||||||
|
6.4.1 |
The institution has strategies for mobilization and optimal utilization of resources and funds from various sources (government / non-government organizations) and it conducts financial audits regularly (internal and external)
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Metric No. |
Key Indicator: 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
6.5.1 |
Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes. It reviews teaching-learning process, structure & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals and records the incremental improvement in various activities.
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
6.5.2 |
Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include: 1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) ; quality improvement initiatives identified and implemented 2. Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA) and follow-up action taken 3. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s) 4. Participation of NIRF and other recognized rankings 5. Any other quality audit / Accreditation recognized by state, national or international agencies such as NAAC , NBA etc.
|
|
||||||||||||||